Continue to site >
Trending ETFs

Tarkio Fund

mutual fund
TARKX
Payout Change
Pending
Price as of:
$29.14 +0.29 +1.01%
primary theme
U.S. Mid-Cap Blend Equity
share class
TARKX (Mutual Fund)

Tarkio Fund

Payout Change
Pending
Price as of:
$29.14 +0.29 +1.01%
primary theme
U.S. Mid-Cap Blend Equity
share class
TARKX (Mutual Fund)

Tarkio Fund

Payout Change
Pending
Price as of:
$29.14 +0.29 +1.01%
primary theme
U.S. Mid-Cap Blend Equity
share class

Name

As of 12/24/2024

Price

Aum/Mkt Cap

YIELD

Annualized forward dividend yield. Multiplies the most recent dividend payout amount by its frequency and divides by the previous close price.

Exp Ratio

Expense ratio is the fund’s total annual operating expenses, including management fees, distribution fees, and other expenses, expressed as a percentage of average net assets.

Watchlist

Tarkio Fund

TARKX | Fund

$29.14

$153 M

0.00%

1.00%

Vitals

YTD Return

24.8%

1 yr return

24.7%

3 Yr Avg Return

3.5%

5 Yr Avg Return

11.6%

Net Assets

$153 M

Holdings in Top 10

66.3%

52 WEEK LOW AND HIGH

$28.9
N/A
N/A

Expenses

OPERATING FEES

Expense Ratio 1.00%

SALES FEES

Front Load N/A

Deferred Load N/A

TRADING FEES

Turnover 12.32%

Redemption Fee N/A


Min Investment

Standard (Taxable)

$2,500

IRA

$2,500


Fund Classification

Fund Type

Open End Mutual Fund


Name

As of 12/24/2024

Price

Aum/Mkt Cap

YIELD

Annualized forward dividend yield. Multiplies the most recent dividend payout amount by its frequency and divides by the previous close price.

Exp Ratio

Expense ratio is the fund’s total annual operating expenses, including management fees, distribution fees, and other expenses, expressed as a percentage of average net assets.

Watchlist

Tarkio Fund

TARKX | Fund

$29.14

$153 M

0.00%

1.00%

TARKX - Profile

Distributions

  • YTD Total Return 24.8%
  • 3 Yr Annualized Total Return 3.5%
  • 5 Yr Annualized Total Return 11.6%
  • Capital Gain Distribution Frequency Annually
  • Net Income Ratio 0.62%
DIVIDENDS
  • Dividend Yield 0.0%
  • Dividend Distribution Frequency Annual

Fund Details

  • Legal Name
    Tarkio Fund
  • Fund Family Name
    Clark Fork Trust
  • Inception Date
    Jun 28, 2012
  • Shares Outstanding
    N/A
  • Share Class
    Other
  • Currency
    USD
  • Domiciled Country
    US
  • Manager
    Russell Piazza

Fund Description

The guiding principle of the Tarkio Fund is the belief that a long-term investor in common stock is a partner with the business in which it invests. Front Street Capital Management, Inc. (the “Adviser”) pursues long-term capital appreciation for its shareholders by employing a disciplined bottom up, fundamental approach to identify equity investments that satisfy its quality and valuation standards. The Fund is non-diversified, which means it has the ability to take larger positions in a smaller number of companies.

Quality companies (as defined by the Adviser) are enterprises run by a management team focused on creating long-term value in the business. The Adviser’s qualitative review of a company focuses on organizational culture, and also includes an analysis of corporate integrity, capital allocation (historically, and on an ongoing basis), and long-term focus of management. As part of this review process, the Adviser will review publicly available information documenting management actions, data regarding culture, and capital allocation decisions.

Specifically, the Adviser looks for companies that demonstrate high levels of integrity, humility, trust, long-term focus, purpose and passion, teamwork (cooperation, not internal competition), and a focus on employee empowerment (driving fear out of the organization), as well as discipline with respect to capital allocation. The Adviser looks for companies that focus on these criteria to continually improve on an ongoing basis and really lives with these companies and considers each company it invests in as a long-term partner. With trust, integrity, and humility, empowered and engaged employees can solve problems using continuous improvement principles to drive more value to customers. If employees can cooperate and share information over time, then company margins, market share, and customer loyalty (and consequently earnings) can compound over the long term.

When making an investment decision, the Adviser also considers the company’s performance with respect to environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors. The Adviser has developed its own internal process for measuring companies’ performance relative to a set of ESG factors that the Adviser believes are a good indicator of long-term financial performance. Each company’s behavior as it relates to these ESG factors is unique, but the Adviser generally believes that environment-impacting actions and omissions (including externalizing costs, pollution/conservation, and sustainability in operations), transparency and accountable governance (such as board and officer compensation levels, transparency of reporting, and honesty and accountability in the event of rule-breaking), and a commitment to diversity, inclusiveness, empowerment and social justice are all indicators of whether a company acts in a manner consistent with the Adviser’s criteria. The Adviser believes positive ESG factors (such as environmental stewardship, community and societal well-being, corporate transparency, and ethical treatment of all stakeholders – not just shareholders) are often indicative of a company’s alignment with the Adviser’s investment criteria as stated above. The Fund, generally, seeks to avoid investing in companies that the Adviser deems inconsistent with these positive ESG factors because the Adviser believes that, typically, companies that are extractive or that profit from social destruction or addictive products tend not to have long-term focus and tend not to have a non-monetary purpose or passion. The Adviser also believes that companies managed with long-term performance in mind are less likely to incur the many various liabilities associated with negative ESG factors, including, among others, exploitation of employees, communities, and the environment. Such liabilities can include employee and/or shareholder lawsuits and regulatory sanctions and fines. However, the Adviser’s internal ESG screening process does not automatically eliminate any type of company from investment. The ESG process is only one part of the Adviser’s overall investment analysis process.

Once companies are identified, the Adviser attempts to find buying opportunities at prices that represent a fair value for a long-term owner. The Adviser’s qualitative review process is subjective and may result in investments in companies that do not satisfy all shareholders of the Fund.

The Fund, under normal market conditions, invests primarily in common stock from small, medium, and large capitalization U.S. companies that are selected for their long-term compounding potential. While it is anticipated that the Fund invests across a range of industries, certain sectors may, at times, be favored over others because the Adviser seeks the best investment opportunities regardless of sector. The sectors in which the Fund may be over-weighted will vary at different points in the economic cycle.

To a significantly lesser extent, the Fund may invest in fixed income securities (including debt securities that are considered speculative and are commonly referred to as “junk bonds”) and securities of foreign issuers, including issuers in emerging markets using the same fundamental research approach based on quality and price. When investing in fixed-income securities, the Fund does not attempt to maintain a certain duration. (“Duration” is a term for the measure of the sensitivity of the price of a fixed-income investment to a change in interest rates. For example, if interest rates move up 1 percentage point (1%) while the Fund’s fixed income duration is 4 years, the price of the Fund’s fixed income investment would be expected to decline by 4%. The larger the duration number, the greater an investment’s sensitivity to changes in interest rates.) In addition, the Fund may invest in other investment companies, such as money market funds and exchange-traded funds (“ETFs”), for cash management and other purposes. The Adviser limits to 5% the Fund’s total assets that may be invested in ETFs.

The Adviser generally will not engage in frequent trading of the Fund’s portfolio securities.

The Adviser may sell or reduce the Fund’s position in a security when the facts or the original investment analysis have changed.

Read More

TARKX - Performance

Return Ranking - Trailing

Period TARKX Return Category Return Low Category Return High Rank in Category (%)
YTD 24.8% -5.3% 38.6% 4.82%
1 Yr 24.7% -6.6% 37.7% 4.82%
3 Yr 3.5%* -17.9% 23.9% 73.28%
5 Yr 11.6%* -1.4% 24.0% 12.31%
10 Yr 11.4%* 2.1% 13.0% 2.84%

* Annualized

Return Ranking - Calendar

Period TARKX Return Category Return Low Category Return High Rank in Category (%)
2023 22.6% -12.9% 28.8% 5.67%
2022 -37.1% -52.6% 20.1% 99.14%
2021 22.6% -43.8% 32.4% 17.49%
2020 26.4% -10.6% 82.1% 1.81%
2019 23.1% -8.5% 37.5% 52.24%

Total Return Ranking - Trailing

Period TARKX Return Category Return Low Category Return High Rank in Category (%)
YTD 24.8% -5.3% 38.6% 4.82%
1 Yr 24.7% -6.6% 37.7% 4.82%
3 Yr 3.5%* -17.9% 23.9% 73.28%
5 Yr 11.6%* -1.4% 24.0% 12.31%
10 Yr 11.4%* 2.1% 13.0% 2.84%

* Annualized

Total Return Ranking - Calendar

Period TARKX Return Category Return Low Category Return High Rank in Category (%)
2023 26.3% 1.2% 31.3% 5.38%
2022 -30.3% -45.7% 21.1% 99.71%
2021 24.4% -30.2% 52.8% 50.44%
2020 27.0% -8.4% 84.3% 4.83%
2019 29.6% 1.0% 43.4% 33.01%

NAV & Total Return History


TARKX - Holdings

Concentration Analysis

TARKX Category Low Category High TARKX % Rank
Net Assets 153 M 728 K 175 B 72.96%
Number of Holdings 36 1 2780 85.63%
Net Assets in Top 10 114 M 402 K 15.4 B 45.92%
Weighting of Top 10 66.31% 0.5% 100.0% 1.69%

Top 10 Holdings

  1. Lumen Technologies, Inc. 13.37%
  2. General Electric Co. 11.66%
  3. Cognex Corp. 8.03%
  4. Danaher Corp. 6.51%
  5. The Manitowoc Co., Inc. 6.46%
  6. MillerKnoll, Inc. 4.78%
  7. ESAB Corp. 4.75%
  8. The St. Joe Co. 3.82%
  9. Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. Class B 3.47%
  10. Modine Manufacturing Co. 3.46%

Asset Allocation

Weighting Return Low Return High TARKX % Rank
Stocks
99.72% 0.85% 100.25% 15.49%
Cash
0.33% 0.00% 99.04% 81.69%
Preferred Stocks
0.00% 0.00% 11.12% 41.97%
Other
0.00% -0.03% 38.10% 58.31%
Convertible Bonds
0.00% 0.00% 1.78% 42.25%
Bonds
0.00% 0.00% 72.71% 46.76%

Stock Sector Breakdown

Weighting Return Low Return High TARKX % Rank
Industrials
26.49% 0.00% 45.89% 3.11%
Technology
21.57% 0.00% 40.65% 11.86%
Consumer Cyclical
12.97% 2.49% 46.48% 49.44%
Real Estate
11.01% 0.00% 25.82% 9.32%
Healthcare
8.16% 0.00% 24.06% 79.66%
Communication Services
7.45% 0.00% 30.98% 6.21%
Financial Services
6.00% 0.00% 46.10% 96.05%
Basic Materials
4.08% 0.00% 16.35% 74.01%
Consumer Defense
2.27% 0.00% 32.18% 87.85%
Utilities
0.00% 0.00% 18.97% 87.85%
Energy
0.00% 0.00% 58.13% 89.83%

Stock Geographic Breakdown

Weighting Return Low Return High TARKX % Rank
US
99.72% 0.85% 100.25% 14.65%
Non US
0.00% 0.00% 10.11% 50.14%

TARKX - Expenses

Operational Fees

TARKX Fees (% of AUM) Category Return Low Category Return High Rank in Category (%)
Expense Ratio 1.00% 0.03% 19.40% 46.74%
Management Fee 0.75% 0.00% 1.50% 68.84%
12b-1 Fee 0.00% 0.00% 1.00% 9.64%
Administrative Fee N/A 0.01% 0.30% N/A

Sales Fees

TARKX Fees (% of AUM) Category Return Low Category Return High Rank in Category (%)
Front Load N/A 3.50% 5.75% N/A
Deferred Load N/A 1.00% 4.00% N/A

Trading Fees

TARKX Fees (% of AUM) Category Return Low Category Return High Rank in Category (%)
Max Redemption Fee N/A 1.00% 2.00% N/A

Related Fees

Turnover provides investors a proxy for the trading fees incurred by mutual fund managers who frequently adjust position allocations. Higher turnover means higher trading fees.

TARKX Fees (% of AUM) Category Return Low Category Return High Rank in Category (%)
Turnover 12.32% 0.00% 304.00% 6.96%

TARKX - Distributions

Dividend Yield Analysis

TARKX Category Low Category High TARKX % Rank
Dividend Yield 0.00% 0.00% 29.78% 92.39%

Dividend Distribution Analysis

TARKX Category Low Category High Category Mod
Dividend Distribution Frequency Annual Annual Quarterly Annual

Net Income Ratio Analysis

TARKX Category Low Category High TARKX % Rank
Net Income Ratio 0.62% -2.06% 3.38% 33.99%

Capital Gain Distribution Analysis

TARKX Category Low Category High Capital Mode
Capital Gain Distribution Frequency Annually Annually Semi-Annually Annually

Distributions History

View More +

TARKX - Fund Manager Analysis

Managers

Russell Piazza


Start Date

Tenure

Tenure Rank

Jun 28, 2011

10.93

10.9%

Mr. Piazza founded Front Street Capital Management, Inc. in 2006. Mr. Piazza began his investment career in 1977 with Crowell Weedon & Co. in California. He then moved to Piper Jaffray & Co. in Missoula, Montana where he became a Portfolio Manager and Vice President of Investments. While at Piper Jaffray & Co., the business evolved into a discretionary managed portfolio model and Mr. Piazza was instrumental in developing the firm’s Discretionary Fee Based Portfolio Management Program. He continued to work on the Piper Navigator Program until 2006 when Piper Jaffray & Co. was purchased by UBS. Mr. Piazza received a B.S. degree in Finance from the University of Montana.

Dominic Piazza


Start Date

Tenure

Tenure Rank

Sep 30, 2019

2.67

2.7%

Dominic Piazza is the Marketing Manager and a member of Front Street Capital Management's research team. Dominic Piazza joined Front Street Capital Management in 2016 after completing his undergraduate degree in environmental science from Willamette University.

Jeremy Brown


Start Date

Tenure

Tenure Rank

Sep 30, 2019

2.67

2.7%

Jeremy Brown is the Development Manager and a member of Front Street Capital Management's research team. Jeremy Brown joined Front Street Capital Management in 2016 following a 10-year career in corporate and securities law with Dorsey & Whitney LLP and K&L Gates LLP. Jeremy received a law degree from New York University School of Law in 2005 and a B.A. in Philosophy from Seattle University in 1999.

Tenure Analysis

Category Low Category High Category Average Category Mode
0.25 38.44 7.3 5.78